Published on

Multi-Agent Parallel Workflow: From Coder to Conductor

First Steps into Multi-Agent Territory

After months of working with single-agent AI coding assistants, we finally took the plunge into multi-agent parallel workflows. The experience has been transformative - not just in terms of productivity, but in how we fundamentally think about our role as developers.

The core concept is deceptively simple: instead of waiting for one AI agent to complete a task before starting the next, you run multiple agents in parallel, each handling different aspects of your project simultaneously. What makes this possible is the combination of vibe-kanban for task scheduling and OpenCode for accessing multiple AI model providers through a single interface.

This isn't just about speed - it's about fundamentally rethinking how we approach complex development tasks. When you can decompose a large project into smaller, independent pieces and have multiple AI agents work on them simultaneously, the entire workflow changes.

The OpenCode Advantage: Provider Flexibility

One of the critical enablers for multi-agent parallel work is OpenCode's provider-agnostic architecture. As we covered in our OpenCode CLI guide, OpenCode supports 75+ LLM providers, allowing you to pick the best model for each specific task.

In our parallel workflow setup, we leverage multiple providers simultaneously:

  • GLM-4.6 (Z.AI) for tasks requiring strong multilingual capabilities
  • MiniMax for creative content generation
  • Gemini (Google) for research and analysis tasks
  • ChatGPT (OpenAI) for complex reasoning
  • Claude Sonnet (Anthropic) for nuanced code generation

This provider diversity isn't just about having options - it's about optimizing each parallel task for the model best suited to handle it. A documentation task might go to one provider while a complex refactoring job goes to another, all running simultaneously.

The Parallel Productivity Multiplier

Over the past two days of intensive multi-agent usage, the productivity gains have been remarkable. We've been working on our graduation thesis, and the output has been significantly higher compared to previous single-agent workflows.

Here's what changed: instead of a linear workflow where we wait for each AI-assisted task to complete before starting the next, we now operate in a parallel execution model. While one agent is researching related work, another is refactoring code, and a third is drafting documentation.

Example parallel workflow:

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                   Main Project                       │
├─────────────────┬─────────────────┬─────────────────┤
│   Agent 1       │   Agent 2       │   Agent 3       │
│   Research      │   Code Impl     │   Documentation │
│   ────────►     │   ────────►     │   ────────►     │
│   [Running]     │   [Running]     │   [Running]     │
└─────────────────┴─────────────────┴─────────────────┘

But the real power isn't just parallelizing a single project. Because everything runs concurrently, you can work on other smaller projects at the same time. While the main thesis work progresses across multiple agents, you might also have agents handling:

  • Bug fixes for side projects
  • Documentation updates for open-source contributions
  • Research for future work

This is the true parallelism advantage - not just speeding up one task, but enabling simultaneous progress across your entire portfolio of work.

Task Decomposition: The Key to Parallelization

The secret to effective multi-agent workflows lies in intelligent task decomposition. Large, monolithic tasks can't be parallelized - you need to break them into independent units that can execute concurrently.

Drawing from the subagent architecture concepts we explored previously, effective decomposition follows certain principles:

Independent execution: Each subtask should be completable without blocking on other subtasks. If task B requires the output of task A, they can't run in parallel.

Clear boundaries: Define precise scope for each task. Vague tasks lead to overlap and conflicts.

Appropriate granularity: Too fine-grained and you waste time on coordination overhead. Too coarse and you miss parallelization opportunities.

Example decomposition for a feature implementation:

Feature: User Authentication System
├── Task 1: Database schema design         [Agent A]
├── Task 2: API endpoint implementation    [Agent B]
├── Task 3: Frontend login component       [Agent C]
├── Task 4: Unit test suite               [Agent D]
└── Task 5: API documentation             [Agent E]

Each of these tasks can start immediately. While there might be some integration work at the end, the bulk of the implementation runs in parallel.

Vibe-Kanban: Orchestrating the Chaos

Managing multiple parallel AI agents requires a robust scheduling system. This is where vibe-kanban comes in - providing the visual task management and scheduling infrastructure to coordinate multiple concurrent workflows.

The kanban approach naturally fits parallel execution:

  • Visual task tracking shows what's running, what's pending, and what's completed
  • Work-in-progress limits prevent overloading (even with AI, there are practical limits)
  • Priority management ensures critical path items get allocated first
  • Status synchronization keeps you informed of progress across all agents

Currently, we're handling the scheduling manually - deciding which tasks to allocate to which agents and when. This works, but it requires constant attention and context-switching.

The Evolution: From Manual to Automated Scheduling

The current state of multi-agent workflows requires human orchestration. We act as the scheduler, making decisions about:

  • Which tasks to parallelize
  • Which models to assign to each task
  • When to check results and integrate outputs
  • How to handle dependencies and conflicts

But this is just the beginning. The natural evolution is toward specialized AI schedulers that can manage the entire multi-agent workflow autonomously.

Imagine providing a high-level goal rather than individual tasks:

Goal: "Implement complete user authentication with OAuth support,
       full test coverage, and API documentation"

Scheduler AI:
├── Analyzes goal
├── Generates task decomposition
├── Assigns optimal models to each task
├── Monitors progress
├── Handles integration
└── Delivers completed feature

The scheduler would understand task dependencies, model capabilities, and optimal parallelization strategies - all without manual intervention.

A Role Transformation

This shift in how we work with AI represents a fundamental role transformation:

Stage 1: The Coder - Traditional development where you write every line of code yourself. AI is just a fancy autocomplete.

Stage 2: The Product Manager - Current multi-agent state. You decompose requirements, assign tasks to AI agents, review outputs, and integrate results. You're managing AI resources rather than writing code directly.

Stage 3: The Company CEO - Future state with AI schedulers. You provide strategic direction and goals. The AI system handles decomposition, assignment, execution, and integration autonomously. You focus on high-level decisions and quality oversight.

We're currently transitioning from Stage 1 to Stage 2. The productivity gains from this shift alone are substantial. Stage 3 promises even more dramatic changes in how software gets built.

Practical Lessons from Two Days of Parallel Work

After intensive parallel workflow experimentation, here are the key takeaways:

Start with clear task boundaries. Ambiguous task definitions lead to overlap, conflicts, and wasted agent cycles. Spend time upfront defining exactly what each parallel task should accomplish.

Match models to tasks. Don't use the same model for everything. As covered in our OpenCode guide, different providers excel at different task types. Use this to your advantage.

Monitor, don't micromanage. Check in on progress periodically, but resist the urge to interrupt running tasks constantly. Trust the process and review results at defined checkpoints.

Plan for integration. Parallel execution is only half the battle. Budget time for integrating parallel outputs, resolving conflicts, and ensuring consistency across the codebase.

Embrace the context switch. With multiple agents running, you can genuinely work on other things. Don't just sit and watch - use the parallel execution time productively.

Looking Forward

Multi-agent parallel workflows represent a genuine paradigm shift in AI-assisted development. The combination of OpenCode's provider flexibility and intelligent task scheduling through tools like vibe-kanban creates possibilities that simply didn't exist with single-agent approaches.

We're still in the early days. Manual scheduling works but adds cognitive overhead. The tools are maturing, but integration isn't seamless yet. However, the productivity gains are real and substantial.

As AI scheduling systems mature and the transition to Stage 3 (CEO mode) becomes feasible, we'll see even more dramatic changes. The developers who learn to orchestrate AI agents effectively today will be best positioned for this AI-native future.

The question isn't whether multi-agent parallel workflows will become standard practice - it's how quickly you'll adopt them.

Related Resources